Designed by Veethemes.com

Latest Posts

Formula 1's return to the old qualifying format has been officially approved by its full governance structure, Autosport can confirm.
Last Thursday FIA president Jean Todt and F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone announced they had accepted a unanimous request from the F1 teams to revert to the qualifying format in force in 2015.
Todt and Ecclestone declared ditching the much-maligned elimination system introduced this year to be "in the interests of the championship", pending approval by the F1 Commission and the World Motor Sport Council.
On Friday afternoon the 26-man F1 Commission signed off its acceptance of ditching the elimination format and returning to the set-up in place for the previous 10 seasons.

Just over five weeks after voting in the initial qualifying revamp, the WMSC has now also unanimously agreed to the return of the old system from this weekend's Chinese Grand Prix to the end of the season.
An FIA statement said: "The World Motor Sport Council today approved, via e-vote, the decision to revert to last season's qualification format for the remainder of the 2016 FIA Formula 1 World Championship.
"The format, where the slowest six cars are eliminated at the end of the first two qualifying sessions before a final 10-car shootout for pole in Q3, will return for this weekend's Chinese Grand Prix."
In the meantime, and throughout the course of the year, the teams will undergo "a global assessment of the format of the weekend", with the prospect an overhaul will be in place for 2017.
Williams deputy team principal Claire Williams expressed her relief at the qualifying u-turn earlier on Monday.
"I'm relieved and Williams is relieved that we are going back to 2015," she said.
"It is obvious what the fans want, I hope it is what the media wants and it's certainly what are partners want."

Formula 1 world championship leader Nico Rosberg expects he will be at Mercedes "for some time to come" despite being out of contract at the end of the year.
Rosberg is now in his seventh season with the team, having joined following its formation in 2010 after it took over Brawn GP at the end of the previous year.
Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff said in December contract talks with Rosberg were unlikely to take place until the middle of this year as he firstwanted to see how the season would pan out.
Rosberg said: "The contract is not something that is present in my mind. Why should it be?
"I'm very comfortable anyway here, I have a great relationship, and I'll be here for some time to come, and that's it.
"It's not something that's on my mind at the moment."
In terms of earning himself a renewed contract, Rosberg has started the season strongly with back-to-back victories in Australia and Bahrain to extend his winning streak to five going back to last season.
Rosberg maintains he is doing nothing differently in his bid to overcome team-mate Lewis Hamilton after being beaten by the Briton in all three seasons they have been together.
"I'm just enjoying it at the moment," added Rosberg.
"I'm very privileged to drive this car, to be fighting for victories for such a long time, and when I go to China I know I'm going to be fighting for the win there as well.
"It's such a great feeling to have, winning is awesome, celebrating with the team, and of course getting all those points, it's great to start the season in such a way, and it's not the end for me.
"But it's really about not looking too far ahead, it's about being in the moment.
"I was flat-out last year, but it didn't often go my way, but now in these first two races it has gone much more my way."
Suggested to Rosberg he was coping better than Hamilton with this season's clampdown on radio transmissions between pitwall and driver, the 30-year-old replied: "Lewis is smart.
"It's not going to be a big problem for him to adapt to those things, so in that case comparing is down to you, but I like the challenge.
"It's up to us now out there, we need to get the job done ourselves, with fuel, this and that, it's a good challenge out there. It's cool."
KEY PLAYERS IN THE 2016/17 SILLY SEASON
After a static 2015/16 winter, there's potential for plenty of upheaval in the F1 driver market over the next 12 months. Here are some the key pieces that have to fall into place.
Rosberg's new deal
Mercedes has previously hinted at changes if its drivers' relationship became fractious again, and with Hamilton under contract that placed Rosberg on the bubble - but he's begun 2016 as the man in form.
Raikkonen's last chance?
Daniel Ricciardo and Valtteri Bottas were among those strongly linked to the second Ferrari seat before the Scuderia decided to retain Kimi Raikkonen for 2016 after all. Will the Finn cling on again?
What next for Verstappen?
F1's hottest young property surely won't spend much longer at Toro Rosso - will he stay in the Red Bull fold and graduate to RBR (and if so, who makes way?) or accept advances from rivals?
Getting Vandoorne on the grid
Now one of the select band of debut points-scorers, Stoffel Vandoorne will surely be on the 2017 grid full-time - but supplanting one of McLaren's pair of veteran world champions or placed elsewhere?
Renault making its mark
Drivers were not top of the list as Renault's Lotus takeover came together late, so it was content to inherit Enstone's contracted duo - and then had to replace Pastor Maldonado with the handily drive-less Kevin Magnussen anyway. But is a Magnussen/Jolyon Palmer pairing how Renault sees its future?

Formula 1's technical chiefs are again attempting to formulate the framework of the 2017 regulations in Friday's meeting at Heathrow.
It is now eight months since the Strategy Group proudly declared plans for "faster cars and thrilling races" from '17 via a range of technical proposals.
It is understood a rules package was close to being signed off towards the end of last season.
Then a spanner was thrown in the works regarding the planned increase in downforce at a technical meeting in December.
Concerns were expressed that while a higher level of downforce would improve laptimes, the offset would likely be lower grip and even more difficulty in overtaking.
Eight of the 11 teams agreed on a revised solution at that meeting but despite that hint of common ground, a number of teams have been working on alternative ideas - which some have described as 'middle-of-the-road' solutions.
This is set to further muddy the waters. One insider expressed a fear "things are going to get messier before they get better".
Throw in the fact the March 1 deadline for when the rules are supposed to be in place is fast approaching, and the pressure is growing to find answers.
Beyond that date changes to the regulations for '17 need unanimous agreement, and that history suggests that is virtually impossible in F1 with so many agendas at work.
Another key area for discussion is the FIA's plan to introduce cockpit protection, hopefully from 2017.
After years of research the FIA will be proposing the Mercedes-designed 'halo' as the way forward.
But again there may well be problems, with suggestions teams may prefer a freedom in design over a universal, FIA-approved, solution.
This would naturally mean the FIA needing to test each in its own right for strength and suitability.
Discussions are also planned around the proposals that emerged from the recent Strategy Group and F1 Commission meetings in Geneva.
Engines are foremost among those. With the independent engine idea shelved, a way forward was agreed with regard to the cost and supply of power units.
From 2018, the four engine manufacturers must supply customers with engines for €12million per annum, which means cuts of €8-13m on the prices they charge at present.
This in itself proposes its own technical difficulties given the money that must be saved, as does the fact that from '18 each car may be permitted to use just three gearboxes per season.
One other item on the agenda will be another look into weight saving.
The increases in tyre size and wheel width for 2017 will mean a weight increase of around 10kg.
The FIA is keen to offset that with cuts elsewhere, but the teams are arguing to do so means an increase in costs.
With so many points of potential disagreement, Williams technical chief Pat Symonds recently suggested postponing the rules revamp to 2018 would be wise - though he acknowledged this was highly unlikely.
No formal press release is expected after the meeting.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnh3cFTVq0okcwYMBSUBeFg


Peugeot RCZ diary notes: Ben Whitworth borrows it for a month

In a ploy to try and wean me off my Caterham 160and prepare me for life after the Seven’s departure, CJ Hubbard suggested I borrow his Peugeot for a bit. A very powerful front-drive coupe is about as far away as you could get from a balsa-light rear-drive roadster. About the only thing they have in common are blown engines and two doors. Oh wait… the Seven doesn’t even have 
I’ll be frank - I loathed the Peugeot for the first few days. It felt colossal and thick-ankled, inert and leaden. The steering wheel writhed and wriggled under acceleration. The front diff kept swerving me offline when powering through corners. The kept seating position made me feel like I was perched on a lifesaver’s laddered chair. The engine’s soundtrack was either drone or rasp. Visibility was appalling. Fuel economy was terrifying. So I gave it another week, ditched my innate subjectivity and tried hard to adopt a balanced approach. Here’s what I have scribbled into the back of the Peugeot’s logbook, a mini road test:
The styling From some angles, the Peugeot looks terrific – muscular, snouty and aggressive – but from others it looks decidedly awkward, dumpy and under-tyred. There are some lovely touches, like the beautiful weave in the carbonfibre roof, and the way its double-bubble profile is picked up by the rear screen. But then you look at the sweeping roof arches and wonder why they decided to undo this expensive exoticness by covering them in horribly cheap matt plastic...
The cabin After almost a year in the Caterham, getting into the Peugeot was a revelation. For a start it had doors. Doors with windows, no less! A leather-wrapped dashboard, climate control, windscreen wipers that worked, a pumping Bluetooth radio that synced with my phone… I felt like a thirsty Oliver Reed winning a drink-all-you-can competition. But – and you guessed there was a but coming – there was a price to pay for these goodies. Those massive A-pillars seriously hinder cornering visibility, forcing you into a weird mid-corner head bobbing-action to see round them. At junctions they could hide an articulated truck, let alone a motorbiker or cyclist. The ergonomics drove me mad. The pop-up sat-nav screen is so far away you need ET’s finger to operate it, and the centre console and chronograph-like instruments look like they were designed by two different design studios. No matter how I adjusted the chunky steering wheel and heavily bolstered seat, I couldn’t seem to get comfortable. I think it has to do with the positioning and angle of the pedals. Pity, because the accelerator and brake pedals are perfectly spaced for rolling your foot off one and onto the other.
On the road I was surprised by how intrusive the torque steer is in first, second and third. On anything less than smooth and straight blacktop, the front wheels would jerk the car’s nose all over the shop. Unsurprising when the blown 1598cc engine’s hefty 243lb ft drops its bomb at 1900rpm, but disconcerting, even when you know it’s going to happen. It’s a corking powerplant, though: rev-happy, muscular and mustard keen, and matched by the brilliant brakes and the long but mechanically precise throw of the gearlever.
The Peugeot Sport diff I quickly got my head around the diff-enhanced cornering dynamics. You have to get the car hooked into the corner right from the off, and let the mechanical diff keep the nose tucked tightly into the apex. Take full advantage of it and the Peugeot can be hustled across the scenery at a terrific pace. And while it is a fast car, it never feels holy-crap fast, deceptively camouflaging its pace with surprising refinement and – here’s the bad bit – a disappointingly soft and fluffy throttle response. 
Ride quality What isn’t soft is the ride quality. After the Seven’s compliancy, the abrupt harshness of the Peugeot’s suspension set-up was a bit of a shock. I know it’s fitted with trick dampers, tweaked geometry and wider tracks that probably shine on the track, but my commute to work is along scarred and acned West Sussex roads with off-camber corners and patchwork surfacing. On these roads the RCZ R ride quality feels out of sorts. It’s way too stiff for fast and relaxed cruising, and when you amp it up a bit, that lack of compliancy means the car crashes and bashes from one intrusion to the next. So you either grit your teeth and get your chiropractor on speed-dial, or you back off.
Verdict After a month in the Peugeot, I couldn’t help thinking what a superb car it would be if it was rear-wheel drive. It would allow you to fully exploit its lovely engine and rid the steering of its torque corruption. Dial back the suspension, sharpen the throttle and you’d have a truly compelling dynamic package. But that’s a bit like wishing the Porsche 911 GT3 was £18k, carried four in comfort and returned 45mpg. It’s never going to happen. Which means I’m not ever going to want an RCZ R in my garage. For £32k, I'd take a nearly new Cayman. Or a Caterham Seven 160, with £10k in my pocket…
By Ben Whitworth


Month 6 running a Peugeot RCZ R: our Pug gets a flattened nose

Things you don’t want to see on an email from the office: Do you know about the damage to your RCZ? Er, no. I don’t actually. What? Sadly it seems that at some point between the Peugeot’s keys leaving my hands and me receiving the dreaded email – about four days – someone driving something red has been appreciating the R’s front bumper a little too closely. Happens, I guess, although it wouldn’t have killed the culprit to own up rather than just running away. The RCZ is away getting repaired (and having a whining noise investigated) now. I miss it.
By CJ Hubbard


Month 5 running a Peugeot RCZ R: which is the best driver's car - the R or the 208 GTi 30th?

Could the RCZ R be the best car Peugeot has ever made? Depends on how you define ‘best’, I suppose, and I’m saddened to admit I’ve never driven a 205 GTi. But a special edition version of the 208 GTi, built to celebrate 30 years of that previous French fancy, has recently crossed my path. Looks a little bit cake-like itself, with that two-tone ‘Coupe Franche’ paint job.
The 208 GTi 30th and the RCZ R are currently the only road-going Peugeots to advertise the involvement of the Peugeot Sport race department. And by advertise, I mean the words ‘Peugeot Sport’ are actually written on the door sill scuff protectors and the front brake calipers (though these are, in fact, made by Brembo). As a current RCZ R custodian, I was really intrigued to see how the two would compare. Especially given the homage to legend of the smaller car. If anything is going to unseat the R as the Peugeot of the moment, it’s surely this jumped-up little shopping cart.
A quick blat round the local B-roads didn’t seem quite the ticket, and with the American adventure at the end of last year (CAR, February 2015) having left me with a habitual hankering for roadside burgers in sympathetic places, thoughts turned to London’s Ace Cafe and its nocturnal gearhead proclivities. And what do you know, the 208’s week-long visit just happened to coincide with the monthly French Classic and Performance night. No brainer, right? Our James had never been to the Ace before, so he volunteered as second driver and I handed him the keys to the RCZ for the trip down from Peterborough to London’s old North Circular, where the Ace has been situated – in various guises – since 1938.
Peugeot RCZ R meets 208 GTi 30th: Peugeot Sport is on a roll


Immediate impressions of the 208 aren’t so good. Compared to the low-slung, c-o-g depth charge that is Peugeot’s funkily cab-forward coupe, the GTi feels too tall and roly-poly – despite the beefed-up suspension and widened track of the 30th. The steering and, in particular, the gearshift also seem fragile and flimsy in the supermini, a surprise given how meaty and mechanical they are in the R. Please don’t tell me Peugeot has fluffed this up. I remind myself the two cars are not only very different pieces of machinery, they are also some £10,000 and 61bhp apart. And, as ever, that it’s best not to jump straight to conclusions.
Yes, the 208 feels tall and, yes, it is most definitely daft to look at, but once you’ve adjusted the little grey cells for that it begins to show more of the R’s fighting spirit. Leading the way is the 30th’s proper limited-slip differential, the exact same torque-sensing Torsen unit that’s fitted to the front axle of the RCZ. Add in the darty directness of the tiny steering wheel, and corners are playtime. Even if those corners are roundabouts in rush hour. The cut and thrust of London traffic means you miss the RCZ’s extra oomph less, too, as the 205bhp 1.6 THP in the 208 is still mighty in the mid-range.
After grabbing a burger and admiring some gnarly old Clios (there wasn’t a massive turn out, to be honest), James drives it back, and declares it everything he’d hoped the standard 208 GTi would be. I’m not quite so smitten, but it’s hard to ignore the much-improved infotainment system and just how well Peugeot Sport has judged the 208’s ride – firm but far more forgiving than the RCZ’s, it deals with torn-up tarmac very capably. But somehow it still feels like a toy, while the R has the air of a true future classic.
By CJ Hubbard


Peugeot RCZ R boot

Month 4 running a Peugeot RCZ R: how practical is the RCZ?

Driving home for Christmas? Not quite. This lot represents the kind gifts to my parents on the occasion of their 40th wedding anniversary. The problem with springing a surprise party being the olds turning up in a car with no luggage capacity whatsoever, which meant temporarily storing the booty in my flat until I was able to deliver it to them in the Peugeot.
Good job I was travelling solo, as the plants (which miraculously survived my custodianship) were never going to fit in the Peugeot’s shallow but otherwise generous rump. Is a full car a happy car? Well, everything made it from Hertfordshire to Dorset in one piece, so no complaints. The firm suspension means flat cornering, so I didn’t even come close to getting a branch in the face. Bonus.
Speaking of filling up, I’ve been experimenting with octane ratings. Sort of. Despite the ridiculousness of getting 266bhp from a 1.6, the filler flap suggests 95 Ron is perfectly acceptable – and by association that I’ve been throwing money away on 98 for no reason. Dropping the premium stuff doesn’t seem to make the car noticeably slower. But there does seem to be more of a swell towards the power peak, suggesting a slight reduction in the spread of torque yet making higher revs more of an event…
By CJ Hubbard


Month 3 running a Peugeot RCZ R: why the limited slip diff makes for brilliant handling

I finished last month’s report on the RCZ R with a mention of the mechanical limited-slip diff. I’m here today to tell you that it’s now making me nervous. I fear that it might just be lulling me into a false sense of security, and at some point soon I’m going to come massively unstuck. Because at the moment, even amidst the winter grimness, it is so remarkably unflappable that it’s as if this Peugeot doesn’t run on Goodyear Eagle F1 but a special rubber compound concocted by Loctite: the grip the front of this car generates in corners is phenomenal.
That said, as if condescending to ward off this unnerving impression of invulnerability, first-gear wheelspin is never far away and, if you really clod the throttle, straight-line torque steer is always a distinct probability – usually in the direction of the nearest cyclist. Sorry. Blame the big turbocharger under the bonnet. But the way the front end hooks up once you’re already committed to a turn is a little piece of magic every single time, and the faster you go the harder it hugs your chosen line. There’s nothing else currently on sale that combines this tarmac rally car dynamic with anything approaching true physical beauty. This is a coupe that behaves like the very best front-wheel-drive hot hatches, a disconnect that continues to delight.
And don’t just take my word for it; several other CAR staffers have been having a go in the Pug recently. Ben Miller, ditching his M3 for once, returned raving, while Tim and James have also been singing the R’s praises. Perhaps most importantly of all, my girlfriend adores both the way it looks and travelling in it, so much so she’s yet to offer even a whisper of complaint about the ride, which I’m personally beginning to find a little wearing on longer journeys. Firmly controlled with a tendency towards the abrupt is perhaps the fairest way to describe it.
The interior doesn’t generate quite such universal appreciation. Ben was definitely impressed, especially with the fancy R seats, and James likes the leather dash covering and all that red stitching (let’s not jump to any conclusions). But Tim is much less convinced, commenting that the quality is not a patch on premium rivals. For my part I like the detailing – the dial faces, the curiously compelling analogue clock – but am troubled by the slightly compromised ergonomics.
This includes those seats, unfortunately, as the unusual angular squab bolsters poke me right in the thighs. And since someone pointed out a creak from the driver’s side – something to do with the adjuster mechanism, I think – I can’t stop hearing it. There’s also an unusual high-pitched whine that’s most apparent at idle. I’m turning the stereo up for now, but some investigation may be required.
These are minor grumbles in the overall scheme of life with Peugeot’s most exotic offering. The performance, the handling and even the fuel economy are proving it a charming companion. 
By CJ Hubbard

Who said the Peugeot RCZ was impractical?

Month 2 running a Peugeot RCZ R: are those the rear seats?

The RCZ R had only just arrived last month, so we’re still getting to know each other. For all my amusement at the pain it’s going to cause CAR’s photographers, I absolutely love the black paint. Together with the R’s fixed rear wing and bodykit, it helps lend an air of subtle menace to a car some people round here feel is otherwise overly feminine.
There’s not much arguing about the RCZ’s pitiful excuse for a pair of rear seats, though. Not that I have a family to worry about. Instead I’m appreciating the way they fold flat to create a longer load floor – resulting in the Peugeot instantly being pressed into service as a parts carrier for my other car, a somewhat well used Mk1 Mazda MX-5. Bit of a squeeze, but you can get four refurbed 14-inch wheels with new tyres into the RCZ’s boot. And you thought it was impractical!
But the best thing about this Peugeot is driving it. Heavy turbocharging means the torque-sensing slippy diff has its work cut out as the weather turns wetter, but my god there’s satisfaction to be had giving it some stick. A delicious few months lie ahead.
By CJ Hubbard 

Month 1 running a Peugeot RCZ R: the introduction

I don’t know. I’ve been at CAR six weeks and already I’m upsetting the photographers. But honestly, the unavoidable fact that this Peugeot RCZ R is hyper-reflective Nera Black is absolutely nothing to do with me: it was on its way to the magazine before I was. So this is two hellos, in a sense.
Turns out the paint is nothing to do with anyone else here, either, as my RCZ is not a press-fleet vehicle but an ex-marketing demonstrator. Which explains how it had already covered 344 miles when it turned up on the doorstep. Days of being on display and repeatedly polished presumably also account for the minor swirl marks it’s accumulated on some areas of the paintwork. What was that about black cars and high maintenance? I fear I’m about to find out.
Bugger. Seems I’m also instantly painting myself as something of a moaning Minnie, and I’m not at all – mostly (is this the time to point out that the RCZ doesn’t have DAB radio? Maybe later, then…). I’m actually massively excited to be running this car, which mixes the common or garden Peugeot image with a frisson of the spectacular and a substantial helping of genuine capability. Or possibly madness.
There are very few cars on sale that offer more bhp per litre than the R’s 266bhp 1.6-litre turbo. I’m writing this just three days after its arrival, so erring on the side of caution, haven’t exactly been making the most of it. But now I’ve had a quick flick through the manual and discovered no mention of any running-in period I’ll be correcting this oversight forthwith. Previous encounters suggest the official 5.9sec 0-62mph time hardly does the in-gear acceleration justice; I’m Teflon-coating my licence at the weekend.
Then there’s the chassis, thoroughly overhauled for the R by Peugeot Sport, in the racing arm’s first overt involvement with a production road car. That the Peugeot Sport team had a slightly different take on the way the RCZ should behave is obvious if you look at the details of the suspension changes. While the front springs are 10% stiffer, the rear springs are 44% stiffer, and though the rear anti-roll bar is thicker, the front anti-roll is slimmer. Thus a pronounced shift in balance, front to rear. This, plus all that power being delivered to the front wheels alone via a proper limited-slip differential, should prove highly entertaining as we move into winter.
Validating its status as the range-topper, standard kit includes satellite navigation, a leather-covered dash with red stitching, some fancy leather and alcantara seats, dual-zone climate control and enough automation that I haven’t yet had to touch the switches for the lights or the wipers. How terribly modern.
I don’t have much room left to talk about options, but that’s okay because the only extras fitted to this £32,000 Peugeot comprise the £520 metallic paint we’ve already covered and a glamorous £1360 carbonfibre roof – as if that provocative shape needed any more attention. With this and the accompanying matte black cant rails, it looks fit for Hotblack Desiato (look it up!).
I’ve also not had the best of starts with the RCZ’s sat-nav (the ‘fastest’ route from Gatwick to Cambridge is straight through London? Really?), which seems appropriate. It’s not getting hot in here, is it?
Stay tuned for more regular updates in this Peugeot RCZ R long-term test review blog here.
By CJ Hubbard


2016 Dodge Viper ACR come to cherish the myth. This American super sports car is handmade, pushing the boundaries of legally being able to wander the streets . Other Viper models produced to this day among the most powerful street racers , the Viper ACR .

Dodge Viper ACR has the best aerodynamics

Dodge engineers have developed the Viper 's aerodynamic structure. During the test, the Dodge Viper ACR while speeding 177 mph in 2016 , 1 ton " downforce ", that has managed to achieve power sticking to the road.

Dodge Viper ACR 2016 with 8.4 -liter engine

The new 2016 Viper ACR models , in the heart of volume of 8.4 liters , capable of producing 645 hp and 600 lb ft that is capable of producing about 814 Nm of torque carries a V10 engine . Viper ACR exhaust vents , side mounted to lower the output pressure . It delivers the power of the new super sports racer six speed manuel gearbox wheels.

 Toyota has announced that the redesigned Yaris WRC car phenomenon in the 90's.

Japanese automotive giant Toyota, produced in the 90s , but then they had to be designed from the WRC model açıkladı.yeni Stopping production is again on the agenda WRC since 2017 will start to appear on the runway.

3910 mm long , 1820 mm wide draw , which will have the Toyota Yaris WRC , 17-inch wheels in the ground floor, will use the 18 -inch wheels on the asphalt runway.

WRC is in the brake system will be different , land on the runway of 300 mm , while the asphalt runway 335 mm discs at the kullanacak.kaput which will have 1.6 liter engine WCR will be the 300 hp of power and 420 Nm of torque üretecek.6 drive system 4 wheel to speed gearbox to be found .